Legal Opinion
Gemsa v. Dorner
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1931No. Calendar 35,619PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtButzel, C. J.
Defendant, Hermann Dorner, the owner of certain patents relating to an oil engine, referred to as the Dorner oil engine, employed plaintiff, Joseph Gemsa, to assist him in selling and licensing manufacturers the right to use the patents. He entered into the following written agreement:
“Detroit, Michigan,
“December 8, 1925.
“Mr. Joseph Gemsa,
499 Winona Avenue,
“Pasadena, California.
“Dear Sir:
“In consideration of the services rendered to me in demonstrating the Dorner oil engine and bringing me in contact with certain people, I hereby agree that if I succeed in selling or leasing any of my rights…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Cummer v. Judge of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Tropical Paint & Oil Co v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zoski v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- National Clay Products Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Scarney v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Taylor v. SS Kresge CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Willard v. GastonMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.