Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Quackenbush

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Hillsdale Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley, Cir. J:

• The controversy hero relates to the title of a span of horses. The defendant in error claims them by virtue of a chattel mortgage given by Harvey Campbell, the husband of the plaintiff in error. Harvey Campbell lived with his wife on her farm, and the horses were there, and in use. Quaclconbush, claiming that a breach had occurred in the condition of the mortgage, replevied the horses without previously making any demand for them. The court below held that no demand was necessary.

We think this was erroneous. The horses were rightfully on the farm, and Mrs. Campbell, who was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trudo v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Ballou v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanford v. Duluth & Dakota Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Cadwell v. PrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Tropical Paint & Oil Co v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Schoolcraft v. SimpsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Myers v. SawvelMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API