Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The law firm of Crockett «fe Brown, P.A., filed suit in Pulaski Chancery Court to obtain an attorney’s fee for representing Richard Courson. The Chancellor awarded a summary judgment against Crockett & Brown as the suit was barred by res judicata. We affirm the Chancellor’s decision as some aspects of the suit are barred by res judicata and others by collateral estoppel.
We first addressed this matter in Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. Courson, 312 Ark. 363, 849 S.W.2d 938 (1993). The facts from which this dispute arose are set forth in that opinion. Briefly, Crockett & Brown…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fisher v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Crockett & Brown, P.A. v. CoursonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Robinson v. BuieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Toran v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Dodrill v. Executive DirectorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
3Cited by45 opinions
- Riverdale Development Co. v. Ruffin Building Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Clements v. Airport Authority of Washoe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. WillisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- First Commercial Bank, N.A. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- South Arkansas Petroleum Co. v. SchiesserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.