Legal Opinion
Stanley v. Finnegan
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 3, 2018No. 6:17-CV-06008PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
P.K. HOLMES, III, CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court is Separate Defendant Katherine Finnegan's motion (Doc. 46) for judgment on the pleadings and brief (Doc. 47) in support of her motion. Plaintiffs Hal and Michelle Stanley (collectively "the Stanleys") filed a response (Doc. 52) in opposition and a brief (Doc. 53) in support of their response. Finnegan filed a reply (Doc. 57) without leave of Court. Finnegan then filed a motion (Doc. 63) for leave to file a reply and a brief (Doc. 64) in support of her motion. The Court denied Finnegan's motion (Doc. 65) for leave and will not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stephen Ward v. Harold Copenhaver, et al.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025