Legal Opinion

United States v. Duvall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 27, 2017No. 16-3093Published

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

This appeal was considered upon the briefs and the appendices filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court denying the appellant’s motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) be affirmed. See United States v. Duvall, 209 F.Supp.3d 125 (D.D.C. 2016).

Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 130 S.Ct. 2683, 177 L.Ed.2d 271 (2010), requires a two-step process to determine whether a sentence should be reduced under § 3582(c)(2). First, the court should determine whether the prisoner is…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. Shannon O. Pinnick A/K/A Scott A. BishopCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. LafayetteCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. DuvallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API