Legal Opinion

United States v. Lafayette

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 3, 2009No. 08-3024PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Under section 3582(c)(2) of Title 18 of the United States Code, district courts may reduce a defendant’s sentence if it was imposed based on a Sentencing Guidelines range that has since been lowered. Relying on this provision, appellant moved for a sentence reduction based on a recent Guidelines amendment and also sought to use his motion as a vehicle to gain the retroactive benefit of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. Ricardo EppsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  2. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. Darlene Mathis-GardnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. James JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  5. United States v. ButlerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API