Legal Opinion

United States v. Duvall

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 2016No. Criminal No. 2009-0236PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge

Before the Court are defendant David Duvall’s two separate motions [205, 213] for sentence reductions under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). While the first motion is based upon the retroactive application of U.S. Sentencing Guidelines’ Amendment 750, which lowered the sentencing ranges for crack cocaine offenses, the second motion is based on Amendment 782, which applies more broadly and is commonly known as “all drugs minus two.” 1 Each motion must be analyzed under the “two-step inquiry” set forth in Dillon v. United States,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Pepper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. United States v. Ricardo EppsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. CookDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  3. United States v. DuvallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
  4. United States v. GordonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API