Legal Opinion

Dales v. Muir

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1944No. Appeal, 257PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Patterson,

This is a bill in equity by Mildred Bates Dales, individually, and on behalf of Sarah A. Dales, as the latter’s interest’ shall appear, appellee, against Bernard Muir, Earle F. Dales, Earle E. Dales and William D. Dales, trading as Charles L. Dales and Company, appellants, and Charles J. Pommer, Recorder of Deeds of Philadelphia’ County, to secure (1) cancellation of á conveyance of certain real estate from Muir to Earle F. Dales, (2) conveyance of said real estate by Muir to Abraham Friedman, Esq., in trust for them, pending determination by the orphans’ court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Finch v. Conrade'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Hertzler v. GeigleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. Orne v. Kittanning Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  5. Hays' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stauffer v. StaufferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Kosco v. Hachmeister, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Holst v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Goldberg v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API