Hays' Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 306, Oct. T., 1893, by The Allegheny National Bank, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 142, on petition for citation. Petition for citation. The record showed that on Feb. 13, 1893, a petition by the Allegheny Nat. Bank was presented and citation awarded against Lydia C. McCutcheon, Margaret McCandless and Mary Eva Hays, children of Wm.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 306, Oct. T., 1893, by The Allegheny National Bank, from decree of O. C. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1893, No. 142, on petition for citation. Petition for citation. The record showed that on Feb. 13, 1893, a petition by the Allegheny Nat. Bank was presented and citation awarded against Lydia C. McCutcheon, Margaret McCandless and Mary Eva Hays, children of Wm. B. Hays, deceased, to appear and show cause why the petitioner should not be subrogated to the lien of certain legacies against their respective purparts. The opinion of the court below was as follows, by Hawkins, P. J.: “ Wm.…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
All the facts necessary to a proper understanding of this case are clearly and concisely set forth in the statement and opinions of the learned president of the orphans’ court, dismissing appellant’s petition for subrogation, etc. The questions involved have been so fully considered and so satisfactorily disposed of by him in said opinions that we adopt them and affirm the decree thereon.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed with costs to be paid by appellant.
2Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Estate of PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Comstock v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hartman v. CohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Goldberg v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.