Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Investigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 18, 1998No. CIV. A. 98-10048PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
YOUNG, District Judge.
Purporting to act pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § '3292, the United States Attorney has applied ex parte for an order suspending certain statutes of limitation as to certain individuals or entities. Unfamiliar with this procedure, the Court has reviewed the eight reported decisions that refer to this statute. See United States v. Bischel, 61 F.3d 1429 (9th Cir.1995); United States v. Roshko, 969 F.2d 9 (2d Cir.1992); Fraser v. United States, 834 F.2d 911 (11th Cir.1987); United States v. Miller, 830 F.2d 1073 (9th Cir.1987); United States v. Davis, 767 F.2d 1025 (2nd…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. George G. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen William BISCHEL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael C. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. NeillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- United States v. Meir RoshkoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. TrainorDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- United States v. RattiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- United States v. TitteringtonDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2005