Legal Opinion

United States v. Titterington

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided February 3, 2005No. Criminal 02-20165Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS THE IN DICTMENT (dkt. # s 169 & 393); 1 AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR A HEARING

DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court are the motions of Richard Titterington, 2 Geoffrey L. Feldman, Stacy Layne Beavers, Robert Bohn, Sherrie Doreen Cave, Michael Elliot Cole, and Alvin Moss (collectively “Defendants”) to dismiss the indictment against them pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3)(B); Fed. R. Crim Proc. 48(b)(1) & (3); the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and 18 U.S.C. §§ 3282 & 3292. This Court previously ruled, in part, on…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API