Legal Opinion
United States v. Neill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 26, 1996No. Crim. Action 95-0323 (JHG)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending are the motions by the United States, Defendant James P. Neill and both defendants for reconsideration of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order of September 24, 1996. The United States requests that the Court reinstate Counts Three through Five of the Indictment, and the defendants request that the Court strike Count Two as barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons expressed below, the defendants’ motions will be denied and the United States’ motion will be granted. Counts Three, Four and Five will…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Stephen William BISCHEL, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. NeillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rex K. DeGEORGE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. George L.J. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. KozenyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- United States v. MeadorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Hunter-Boykin v. George Washington UniversityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.