Legal Opinion

Bannister v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by Augusta M. Bannister, administratrix of the estate of Elijah B. Bannister, deceased, against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company, for negligently causing the death of plaintiff’s intestate. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

Plaintiff’s husband was killed at about 6 o’clock on the evening of February 4, 1893, at the crossing of Holden avenue and the track of the defendant in the city of Detroit. He had come to this crossing on a Grand Trunk suburban train. Holden avenue at this point is crossed by the Grand Trunk tracks. Next to it, and about 76 feet distant, are the defendant’s tracks, and beyond that the Michigan Central tracks. Two other parties alighted from the Grand Trunk train at the same time the decedent left it. They passed along on the westerly side of the avenue, while Mr. Bannister took the walk on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kwiotkowski v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Pzolla v. Michigan Central R. R.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Mahlen v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Gebhard v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Folkmire v. Michigan United Railways Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API