Mahlen v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. Case. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves, O. J.
The plaintiff recovered damages for being struck and injured by one of defendant’s • trains while he was going on foot across the track on a public street, and the defendant seeks a reversal on allegations of error.
The trial was before a jury. The defendant’s negligence was averred to consist in the three particulars of running the train without a head-light; in going at excessive speed ; and in failing to give warning by bell or whistle. The first two were ruled out, and the defendant’s culpability was therefore rested at last on the allegation of failure to sound the bell or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railroad v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richards v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Brinker v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- Bannister v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Van Auken v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893