Gebhard v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion. .
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
Plaintiff was passing from his place of business to. his home, and while walking over the railroad Crossing of the defendant upon Atwater street, in the city of Detroit, was struck by an engine, and injured. Upon the trial in the circuit court, after the plaintiff rested his case, the judge instructed the jury to find a verdict for the defendant upon the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence.
The correctness of this ruling is the sole question in the case. If but one conclusion can be drawn from the evidence, then the ruling was correct. If different conclusions can…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mynning v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bannister v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Grostick v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1892