Legal Opinion
McGill, Thu v. Munoz, George
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 18, 2000No. 97-7123PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Thu McGill filed suit against her former employer, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC), alleging, inter alia, that OPIC discriminated against her in violation of the Rehabilitation Act. The district court denied OPIC’s post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law on that claim, and OPIC appealed. We hold that because McGill failed to offer evidence from which a reasonable jury could have concluded that OPIC discriminated against her, the decision of the district court must be reversed.
I
OPIC is a federal agency established by Congress to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Forman, Paul v. Small, Lawrence M.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Matthew McGrath v. Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- Montgomery v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Lemmons v. Georgetown University HospitalDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.