Legal Opinion

Mack Al Green v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 17, 2001No. 00-2624PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Mack Green challenged his federal conviction and sentence, see 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the district court, after holding an evidentiary hearing, denied relief. Because the court failed to appoint counsel to represent Mr. Green at the hearing, we vacate the district court order denying relief and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

Rule 8(a) of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings requires a district court to decide whether a hearing is necessary to determine the merits of a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Under Rule 8(c), “[i]f an evidentiary…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bucci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Francisco Curbelo, A/K/A Murando, United States of America v. Francisco Curbelo, A/K/A MurandoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  3. Crossland v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Graham v. PortuondoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Jon Henry Sweeney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API