Crossland v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice MINTON.
I. INTRODUCTION.
Shortly after submitting this case to the jury, the trial court excused one of the jurors and replaced him with a discharged alternate juror, who was apparently located and returned to the courthouse. Such a post-submission substitution of jurors is reversible error under current Kentucky precedent if the error is preserved. 1 By contrast, we held in an unpublished ease that such a post-submission substitution did not require reversal if the error is unpreserved. 2 Having re-examined the post-submission juror substitution issue in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Commonwealth v. BenhamKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. Bryant, Smith and WheelerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- McCleery v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Kiper v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Williams v. CavazosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.