Jon Henry Sweeney v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Jon Sweeney (Sweeney) in this post-conviction proceeding seeks relief from his underlying criminal conviction relating to the unauthorized interception of cable service and illegal currency structuring for which he is serving 70 months (5 years, 10 months) imprisonment. Sweeney argues that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated when his attorney left the courtroom, with the permission of the district court, 1 to go to the bathroom during the government’s direct examination of a co-conspirator. The district court recognized that the departure violated Sweeney’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Alexander Michael RoyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Lake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- United States v. Terrance BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Com. v. Dorczuk, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Pressley v. RichDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.