Legal Opinion

State v. Lesley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 1, 2000No. 99C-41014; CA A108516PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state appeals, and defendant cross-appeals, from the trial court’s order allowing a motion for a new trial. ORCP 64 B. Each has moved to dismiss the other party’s appeal. As we explain below, the state’s appeal is untimely, and there is no statutory basis for defendant’s cross-appeal. We grant both motions to dismiss.

After a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of second-degree assault, ORS 163.175, and first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415. On September 13,1999, defendant filed a motion for a new trial on the grounds that a new witness had been located whose testimony would…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of ConleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. Applegate v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ryerse v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API