Legal Opinion

Applegate v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. Proceeding by James Applegate and others against the City of Portland and others to review a reassessment for the special improvement of a "street. From a judgment of dismissal, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moore.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs from a judgment dismissing a special proceeding instituted to review the action of the council of the City of Portland in attempting to reassess certain real property for benefits resulting from the improvement of a street. The circuit court for Multnomah County, pursuant to a petition therefor, caused to be issued a writ of review, the return to which, as disclosed by the transcript, sets forth certified copies of the proceedings relating to such improvement, showing that on November 2, 1904, a resolution was adopted, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Bank of Columbia v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Strout v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Davis v. SilvertonOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Oregon Transfer Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Grant v. MichaelsMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hughes v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Wagoner v. City of La GrandeOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rogers v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Pioneer Real Estate Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API