Legal Opinion

State v. Lesley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 28, 2001No. 99C-41014; CA A108516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

The state, as appellant, and defendant, as respondent, both petition for reconsideration and modification of our dismissal of the state’s appeal. State v. Lesley, 170 Or App 623, 13 P3d 571 (2000). We allow both petitions in order to amplify our reasoning and adhere to our original opinion as so modified.

In our original opinion, we held that the state’s appeal from the trial court’s order allowing defendant’s motion for new trial was untimely.1 The material circumstances were as follows: (1) On September 13, 1999, after a jury had found him guilty, defendant moved for a new trial; (2) on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ensign v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. State v. LesleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ryerse v. HaddockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API