Holmes v. Seaboard Portland Cement Co.
New York Supreme Court
Joint demurrer of several defendants to the complaint upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that causes have been improperly united.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
All the defendants in this action, with the exception of Benjamin S. Catching's, have demurred jointly to the plaintiff’s complaint, upon the ground that it does not state a cause of action, and also upon the ground that various causes of action have been improperly united. The complaint alleges that on or about April 22, 1908, the plaintiff and defendant Beaton, each being interested in the General Finance Company (hereinafter called the Finance Company), the Cement Engineering & Construction Company (hereinafter called the Engineering Company), and the Seaboard Portland Cement Company…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Mildenberg v. JamesNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Fish v. HoseNew York Supreme Court · 1880
- Moore v. Charles E. Monell Co.New York Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- Columbia River Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- People ex rel. Perry v. Gillette, New York County Courts1910
- Holmes v. Seaboard Cement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Lewis v. ClarkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914