Legal Opinion

Fish v. Hose

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1880PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Vorst, J.

This is a joint demurrer by the defendants. The plaintiff has clearly a cause of action against the defendants, separately. The demurrer takes the objection that the facts stated do not constitute a cause of action against the defendants, jointly or severally.

But in an action against two defendants the complaint will not be held bad on a joint demurrer by both defendants, put upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, if it states a cause of action against *239either (Phillips agt. Hagadorn, 12 How. P. R., 17; Eldridge agt. Bell, idem, 547).

In order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peabody v. Washington County Mutual-InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Richtmyer v. RichtmyerNew York Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. Seaboard Portland Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Hodge v. DrakeNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  3. McCrea v. ChahoonNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API