Legal Opinion

Moore v. Charles E. Monell Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer by defendants to plaintiffs’ complaint. Other facts appear in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTruax, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendants executed thé agreement annexed to the complaint. That agreement contains a provision to the effect that the defendant corporation will *236make a noté, payable on demand to the order of plaintiffs’ intestate, for the sum of $14,471.17, with interest, and that after having been indorsed by the party of the second part, it will deliver it to the party of the first part, the plaintiffs’" intestate, and that the party of the second part will indorse the said note so made as aforesaid, and will deliver the same to the said party of the first-part. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kent v. . Quicksilver Mining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Marie v. . GarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Columbia River Co. v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Holmes v. Seaboard Portland Cement Co.New York Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Pourchot v. Real Estate-Land Title & Trust Co.Pennylvania Municipal Court, Philadelphia County · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API