Nevio Restrepo v. Edward McElroy Interim Field Office Director for the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CALABRESI, Circuit Judge.
In this case, we again examine how the presumption against retroactive legislation, a principle rooted in “[ejlementary considerations of fairness,” Landgraf v. USI Film Prods., 511 U.S. 244, 265, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229 (1994), applies in the context of immigration law. The government appeals from a judgment of the district court (Weinstein, J.) granting an aben’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus upon finding that the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act’s elimination of section 212(c) discretionary relief was impermissibly retroactive as applied…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Shobinder Gill v. Immigration and Naturalization ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- De Johnson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Zhen Nan Lin v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Abimbola v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Abimbola v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.