Legal Opinion

Bascom Construction Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1992No. Civ. 91-177-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVINE, Chief Judge.

This action involving the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is but one example of the difficulties courts have had in grappling with the complex, and occasionally inconsistent, provisions of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). See, e.g., Marquis v. FDIC, 779 F.Supp. 6, 8 (D.N.H. 1991) (and cases therein cited).

FIRREA provides that all civil actions involving FDIC “shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States,” 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(A), and, subject to narrow exceptions, that such actions may be removed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Marquis v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Bascom Construction, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. BASCOM CONSTRUCTION INC. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bascom Construction, Inc. v. City Bank & TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Donald D. Snyder & Son, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Pyle v. Meritor Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API