Bascom Construction Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
This action involving the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is but one example of the difficulties courts have had in grappling with the complex, and occasionally inconsistent, provisions of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). See, e.g., Marquis v. FDIC, 779 F.Supp. 6, 8 (D.N.H. 1991) (and cases therein cited).
FIRREA provides that all civil actions involving FDIC “shall be deemed to arise under the laws of the United States,” 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(A), and, subject to narrow exceptions, that such actions may be removed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Marquis v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- Bascom Construction, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- BASCOM CONSTRUCTION INC. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bascom Construction, Inc. v. City Bank & TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Donald D. Snyder & Son, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Pyle v. Meritor Savings BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993