Legal Opinion
BASCOM CONSTRUCTION INC. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided December 17, 1991No. Civ. 91-177-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
By virtue of defendant’s motion to reconsider, the court again visits plaintiffs motion to remand this civil action to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
On November 17, 1991, this court ordered this case remanded, after finding that it involved only the interpretation of state law. 777 F.Supp. 123. 12 U.S.C. § 1819(b)(2)(D)(iii). 1
In the instant motion, defendant correctly points out, as the court’s prior order indicated, that all three subsections of section 1819(b)(2)(D) must be satisfied before the court can remand a case involving the FDIC. See Capizzi v. FDIC, 937…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Michael J. Capizzi v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Bascom Construction, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bascom Construction, Inc. v. City Bank & TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Bascom Construction Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Donald D. Snyder & Son, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992