Legal Opinion
Bascom Construction, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 14, 1991No. Civ. 91-177-DPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
The court again has before it plaintiffs motion to remand this civil action to the New Hampshire Supreme Court. Upon originally analyzing plaintiffs motion, the court recognized that remand would be appropriate unless defendant raised an issue of federal law. See generally Order of September 27, 1991. Accordingly, the court ordered defendant to supplement the record. As defendants have done so, 1 and plaintiffs have timely responded, the court turns to the merits of the motion. 2
Discussion
Congress has given FDIC the power to remove from state court nearly any case in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Harold v. Beighley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- James N. And Betty G. Bowen v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republicbank--El PasoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Murphy v. Financial Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bascom Construction, Inc. v. City Bank & TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- New Bank of New England, N.A. v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- BASCOM CONSTRUCTION INC. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
- Bascom Construction Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ford Mall Associates Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.