Legal Opinion

State v. Severson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1985No. TC C82-12-39047 CA A28388 SC S30516PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

The issue presented is whether a psychiatrist’s report should have been admitted into evidence as an adoptive admission. The report was used in a pretrial hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress statements she made to the police. The question was whether defendant was competent to waive her Miranda 1 rights. After reviewing the report, the trial judge ruled that defendant was competent and declined to suppress her statements. Defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and she appeals.

Two masked men robbed a convenience store and left in a car driven by a third person. Soon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Krantz v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1957
  4. Oxley v. Linnton Plywood Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. National Research Development Corp. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. Tiedemann v. Radiation Therapy ConsultantsOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API