Legal Opinion
Grundberg v. Upjohn Co.
District Court, D. Utah
Decided June 12, 1991No. 89-C-274 GPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON THE USE OF PROTOCOL 321 REPORT FORMS
RONALD N. BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The defendants have objected to a subpoena issued by plaintiffs to defendant to produce the underlying raw data of Protocol 321.1 These are the report forms used to record the reaction of persons tested in relation to the use of Halcion in conjunction with clinical study 321 which was conducted prior to the marketing of Halcion by defendant, Upjohn.
The report forms for protocol 321 were filled out by persons used in testing the effect of the ingestion of the drug Halcion and its impact…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Harvey M. RenvilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diaz v. SilverDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Lear Automotive Dearborn, Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
- PHILIP MORRIS USA INC., and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO. v. ROSE POLLARI, etcDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Transbay Auto Service, Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Transbay Auto Service, Inc. v. Chevron USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015