Legal Opinion
United States v. Harp
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 31, 1948No. Civ. No. 3726PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROADDUS, District Judge.
Parties and Jurisdiction
1. This action is brought by the United States against O. G. Plarp, doing business as O. G. Harp Poultry and Egg Company, to recover liquidated damages as a result of alleged violations of the Public Contracts Act, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 35-45, in the hiring, by defendant, of girls under the age of sixteen years; and the employment of girls between the ages of sixteen and eighteen years for periods of more than *238eight hours per day in violation of the terms of the Act and the terms of exemptions thereto issued by the Secretary of Labor under the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cope v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Martinez v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1968
- United States v. New York Dock Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
- United States v. Sweet Briar, Inc.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950
- United States v. W. H. Kistler Stationery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- United States v. Lance, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.