Legal Opinion
Dannenburg v. Dannenburg
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 8, 1954No. 35092PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
This action involves a construction of the will of Sarah Elizabeth Dannenburg, deceased.
For convenience the different paragraphs of the will and the two codicils are numbered. The will and codicils, omitting the attestation clauses, read:
“Will of Sarah Elizabeth Dannenburg
“1. I, Sarah Elizabeth Dannenburg of Chelsea, Oklahoma, being of sound mind do make and publish this my iast will.
“2. I, hereby revoke all other wills and testamentary instruments. I am a widow, and have four surviving children, viz.:
“O. L. Dannenburg, now at Los Angeles, California
“Henry W. G. Dannenburg, of Oklahoma City,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of SuttonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Estate of EversoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- United States v. Lottie A. Mappes, Individually, and Ernest E. Mappes, of the Estate of William G. Mappes, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Hein v. HeinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Shippy v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Sivia v. SnyderCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.