Legal Opinion

Peppe v. Knoepp

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1956No. 5396PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

At times in this Court, a case after submission is assigned to a member for opinion before the full Court has agreed on the judgment. In that situation, final consideration is deferred until the opinion is prepared and the Court may consider it along with the evidence and the briefs. That was the procedure followed on this appeal and explains why the minority opinion sets forth the operative facts and discusses the specific assignments of error and cases cited by counsel.

We adopt the statement of facts and are in accord with the minority opinion, in the main, but differ…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gorsuch Homes, Inc. v. WootenOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Kuhn v. GriffinOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
  3. Fry Bros. Ex Rel. Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee v. Van Waters & Rogers (In Re Fry Bros.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. City of Akron v. Akron Thermal, Ltd. Partnership (In Re Akron Thermal, Ltd. Partnership)District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Discover Bank v. OwensCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API