Legal Opinion
Chicago HMO v. Trans Pacific Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 9, 1985No. 84 C 2791PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROYNER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Chicago HMO, Ltd. (“Chicago HMO”) filed its six count complaint alleging that defendant Trans Pacific Life Insurance Co. (“Trans Pacific”) breached a contract of specific excess insurance between Chicago HMO and Trans Pacific by refusing to pay benefits during the first 12 months after the expiration of the applicable policy (Count I), and by failing to give timely notice of Trans Pacific’s decision not to renew the policy (Count II). Count III of the complaint seeks a declaration that the insurance contract was at all relevant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Haroco, Inc. v. American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Walter E. Heller International Corporation, & Ronald J. GrayheckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- American Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Haroco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McCullough v. SuterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Beck v. Cantor, Fitzgerald & Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- W.E. O'Neil Construction Co. v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Nalco Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Arenson v. Whitehall Convalescent & Nursing Home, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Bageanis v. Am. Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.