State Highway Board v. Hazen
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtKeyser, J.
This is a petition under 19 V.S.A. §227 to determine the necessity for the construction of a segment of interstate highway with an interchange in the Town of Norwich and includes the relocation and alteration of a section of both U.S. Route No. 5 and Vt. Route No. 10.
There were no pleadings or answer filed to the petition. The court below after hearing and findings determined the taking was necessary. This appeal is by Emma Sargeant, a property owner on State Route No. 10, joined by her husband, and by a tenant of Mrs. Sargeant.
The only objection of these appellants to the entire project…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Latchis v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- American Oil Company v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Savard v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- State Highway Board v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re South Burlington-Shelburne Highway ProjectSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- In Re the Speed Limit for the Union Pacific Railroad Ex Rel. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- State Highway Board v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
- Hinesburg Sand & Gravel, Co. v. Chittenden Solid Waste DistrictDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1997
- Auclair v. VERMONT ELECTRIC POWER CO., INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.