Legal Opinion
State Highway Board v. Pratt
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 4, 1969No. 28-68PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, J.
This petition was brought by the Vermont State Highway Board, under the authority of Title 19 V.S.A. Chapter 5, Condemnation, particularly §§224-228, as well as 19 V.S.A. Chapter 17. relating to limited access facilities.
Proposed Route 4 will be a limited-access, four-lane highway from the Town of West Rutland, Vermont to the New York State line. This appeal by petitionee, Edna T. Jensen, is from a determination that it is necessary to use Dutton Avenue, sometimes known as Scotch Hill Road in Fair Haven, Vermont as an access road to proposed Route 4. There is no objection to Route 4 itself,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
- State v. FairbanksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
- Latchis v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
- Eno v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- State Highway Board v. CoburnSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Myott v. MyottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Green Mountain Marble Co. v. State Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1972
- Bishop v. Town of BarreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Hanson-Metayer v. Hanson-MetayerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- State Highway Board v. JacksonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.