Legal Opinion

People v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 4, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends on appeal from a conviction of robbery in the third degree, following a retrial, that he was improperly denied the minutes of his first trial and a Wade hearing conducted prior to the retrial. The court properly determined that the trial transcript was not discoverable under CPL 240.44, 240.45 and People v Rosario (9 NY2d 286). Since the trial transcript was "as available to defendant as to the prosecution, defendant had the responsibility to obtain it if he believed it necessary” (People v Frank, 107 AD2d 1057). The defendant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. SandersNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. People v. ColeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AstacioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. People v. SeavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. People v. TchilingurianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. FredericksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API