People v. Frederickson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends on this appeal that he was unconstitutionally seized by the police since the facts and circumstances surrounding his seizure, while concededly sufficient to support an investigatory stop, did not rise to the level of probable cause. "Probable cause exists if the facts and circumstances known to the arresting officer warrant a prudent man in believing that the offense has been committed” (People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382, 384), and that the one *581arrested is the perpetrator (People v Carrasquillo, 54 NY2d 248, 254). The evidence at the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- People v. CantorNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. TrowbridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrnjaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989