Legal Opinion

Flynn v. Kumamoto

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1937No. Civ. 5836PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries sustained by Reed Flynn, a minor.

The facts surrounding the accident, which are not disputed, show that appellant George Kumamoto was driving a sedan with the permission of the owner of the car and with the consent of his father and mother, who had, prior to the accident, signed a driver’s application for George Kumamoto, a minor.

The accident occurred on the night of October 20, 1935, at about 7 o’clock in the evening. At that time, Reed Flynn, a minor aged about 14 years, was riding a blue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  2. SPENCE, ADM'X v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Maire v. Minidoka County Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Casalegno v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Farole v. EichmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API