Flynn v. Kumamoto
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This appeal arises from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries sustained by Reed Flynn, a minor.
The facts surrounding the accident, which are not disputed, show that appellant George Kumamoto was driving a sedan with the permission of the owner of the car and with the consent of his father and mother, who had, prior to the accident, signed a driver’s application for George Kumamoto, a minor.
The accident occurred on the night of October 20, 1935, at about 7 o’clock in the evening. At that time, Reed Flynn, a minor aged about 14 years, was riding a blue…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Hatzakorzian v. Rucker-Fuller Desk Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
- SPENCE, ADM'X v. RasmussenOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Maire v. Minidoka County Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Casalegno v. LeonardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Farole v. EichmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.