Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Shoemake

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2002PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANICE M. HOLDER, J„

delivered the opinion of the court, in which

FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and E. RILEY ANDERSON and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ, joined.

We granted this appeal to determine the proper standard to apply to a petition to modify custody when both parents-are parties. We hold that a trial court may modify an award of child custody when both a material change of circumstances has occurred and a change of custody is in the child’s best interests. We hold that the preponderance of the evidence does not support the trial court’s ruling that a material change of circumstances has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Constructors, Inc. v. Loudon County Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Blair v. BadenhopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hass v. KnightonTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nichols v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Neal Lovlace v. Timothy Kevin CopleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. ArmbristerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jordan v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kaplan v. BugallaTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Commerce Union Bank Brentwood, Tennessee D/B/A Reliant Bank v. Kelly D. BushCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API