Hass v. Knighton
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
Upon consideration of the Appellants’ application for permission to appeal and the entire record in this cause, we are of the opinion that the application should be denied because the results reached by the trial court and the Court of Appeals on the merits of this cause are correct.
Since the final decree of the trial court and the Court of Appeals is to remain unchanged, we deem it unnecessary to grant Appellants’ application. However, we do deem it appropriate to file this memorandum opinion and designate it for publication in order to clarify the scope of review in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1949
- Bah v. BahCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Bevins v. BevinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Riddick v. RiddickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1973
- Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In re C.K.G.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
- Andrew K. Armbrister v. Melissa H. ArmbristerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Blair v. BadenhopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Tenn-Tex Properties v. Brownell-Electro, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Kendrick v. ShoemakeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.