Rissman v. Krenn & Dato Construction Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor:
In this case the bill seeks a decree against Krenn & Dato Construction Company for the payment of a negotiable promissory note in the face amount of $56,400.00 made by Krenn & Dato Construction Company to the order of Edwin D. Krenn and bearing date March 7, 1932.
The complainant claims that he and the defendant Louis W. Adams own the note as co-trustees. Though the note was made negotiable in character, the complainant concedes on his brief that he and his co-trustee are not holders in due course within the meaning of the negotiable instruments act. He claims that their status…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Delaware County Commissioners v. Diebold Safe & Lock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- County of Harris v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Continental Guaranty Corp. v. Peoples Bus LineSuperior Court of Delaware · 1922
- Gordon v. Hartford Sterling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Gaugler v. Chicago, M. & P. S. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re MarkelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- International Rediscount Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Katz v. Exclusive Auto Leasing, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1971
- Financeamerica Private Brands, Inc. v. Harvey Hall, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1976
- Deivert, M. v. Pittsburgh ChauffeurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018