Legal Opinion
Flanagan v. Petersburg
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1929No. 6496PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Upon the petition of H. L. Flanagan, the circuit court awarded a peremptory writ of mandamus commanding Dr. Glen Moomau, mayor, L. L. Cooperider, recorder, and W. D. Trent, Eston Harmon, Fred Harmon, Wade Rexrode and Wilson Deadrick, council, of the town of Petersburg, Grant county, to issue to the petitioner a pool room license.
The answer and return of the respondents to the petition and alternative writ of mandamus, denied that Flanagan was a fit person to operate a pool room, and averred an established policy of the town, in the interest of public morals, to refuse all applications for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Booth v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mayor of Hagerstown v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- In Re JonesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brackman's, Inc. v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
- Harry DARKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CINCINNATI, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- State ex rel. Jimmy's Western Bar-B-Q, Inc. v. City of IndependenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- Barth v. De CourseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- State Ex Rel. Baylor v. City of HintonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930