Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barth v. De Coursey

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1949No. 7529Published

1DissentGivens, Justice

The County ordinance does not prohibit the sale of beer, hut is a term or condition under which licenses will issue, in the exercise of the Commissioners’ discretion expressly granted by the statute, considered by them to be thus limited for the best interests of the County. State v. Gregory, 191 Wash. 70, 70 P.2d 788.

“The designation of localities where the sale of intoxicating liquor is inhibited is not prohibition, but a mere regulation of sale.” Garonzik v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 533, 100 S.W. 374, syl. 1.

Cited with approval in Terretto v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 188, 215 S.W. 329 at 330; Ex…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. City of Tarkio v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Ex Parte A. AbramsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Lloyd Corporation v. Bannock CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API