Legal Opinion

Muktarian v. Barmby

California Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1965No. Sac. 7544PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

In September 1961 William E. Barmby brought this action against his son to quiet title to certain real property. At the close of plaintiff’s case, defendant moved for judgment pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8. The trial court concluded that the action was barred by the three-year statute of limitations applicable to actions for relief on the ground of fraud or mistake (Code Civ. Proc., § 338, subd. 4) and entered judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

In late 1947, at age 75, plaintiff married for the second time. Defendant, seeking to prevent the second wife from…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Estate of PieperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Salazar v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Bank of New York Mellon v. Citibank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Lichty v. SickelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Bangerter v. PettyUtah Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API