Legal Opinion

Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District v. Tomax Development Corp.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 31, 2010No. ED 93955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NANNETTE A. BAKER, Judge.

Introduction

Tomax Development Corporation and SAV Investment Corporation (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District (“MSD”)’s motion for summary judgment. Appellants’ brief fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure so substantially that we cannot review this appeal, and therefore we dismiss it.

Discussion

Appellants’ brief fails to comply with Rule 84.04 1 in virtually every respect and renders their claims largely incomprehensible. Rule 84.04 sets forth various requirements for appellate briefs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Brown v. Ameristar Casino Kansas City, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Shochet v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Lueker v. Missouri Western State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Thornton v. City of KirkwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Branson v. Hotels.com, LPMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API