Legal Opinion
In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 2010No. M 07-1827 SI; MDL No. 1827PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*295ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE UNTIMELY DECLARATIONS ALL CASES
SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.
Now before the Court is the direct purchaser plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court GRANTS defendants’ motion to strike certain declarations as untimely.
*296BACKGROUND
I. The TFT-LCD market
This multidistrict litigation stems from allegations of a global price-fixing conspiracy-in the market for Thin…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Pamela Brennan v. Concord Efs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Herrera v. LCS Financial Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Nitsch v. DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.