Legal Opinion
Pamela Brennan v. Concord Efs, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2012No. 10-17354PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs-Appellants (Plaintiffs) are automated teller machine (ATM) cardholders, who allege horizontal price fixing of fees paid to the ATM owners by the banks (issuing the ATM cards to the cardholders) when cardholders retrieve cash from an ATM not owned by their bank. Plaintiffs do not directly pay the allegedly fixed fee; therefore, as indirect purchasers, Supreme Court precedent prohibits Plaintiffs from bringing this suit. See Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720, 97 S.Ct. 2061, 52 L.Ed.2d 707 (1977). Further, Plaintiffs do not qualify for the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Fresno Motors, LLC v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Veronica Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ninth Inning, Inc. v. Directv, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network "UCR" Rates LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.