Legal Opinion
Renewal Body Works, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 1, 2005No. 03-2809LPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiff filed an Opposition, to which defendant filed a Reply. Oral argument was deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion, treated as a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
I. Facts
All of the facts set forth herein are either undisputed or alleged and assumed to be true for purposes of the pending motion. Plaintiff, Renewal Body Works (“Renewal”), is a corporation controlled by members of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barclay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Ladd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- The Shoshone Indian Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Illig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.